One Response to “Ableton Operator Inspiration From Mark Mosher”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. Jason

    Very nice. Absolutely. This is where we see how powerful Ableton can be with its limitless racking and automation potential.

    Fooling around now on this rainy day with an Operator rack, sporting a single chain, that I assembled last night (Honestly I am quite new to attempting to program patches using FM synthesis but I am finding it tonnes of fun learning all the tricks).

    I’ve got a very minimalist MIDI music clip which I’ve duplicated several times repeating ONE note at a fixed pitch, and I am challenging myself to use FM and automation to invoke all of the tonal variation and thereby creating any interesting progressions or transitions exclusively with Operator’s FM and Live effects included in the aforementioned chain (2 Phasers, a Chorus and a Reverb). Interesting to note that the first Phaser is used to provide extra harmonic content for the FM output. I was pleasantly surprised by the effect phasing had when placed after the output of an FM-generated patch. This was an eye-opener for me, as I realised that depending on synthesis used while programming a patch, different effects have…well,…different effect.

    Anyway, this is such an interesting experiment to conduct with Operator, as you stated…Such limitless potential with modulation of FM. We’ll just have to see where this all leads.

    And regarding programming using FM synthesis, if one limits oneself to a certain extent, one may discover that it becomes easier (natural) to zero-in and focus harder on the micro-elements that create intrigue in a single sound during its playback. I am teaching myself this very lesson during the past year while learning to design sounds using various methods of synthesis. Most of the time, effects which follow a patch should remain subtly applied in order for the ears to sense the actual effect of the effect on the output.

Leave A Comment...